<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter Packs or Are you on the list?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://toddjordan.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/twitter-packs-or-are-you-on-the-list/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://toddjordan.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/twitter-packs-or-are-you-on-the-list/</link>
	<description>Demystifying the web and more. Come join me.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 01:31:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: chrisbrogan</title>
		<link>http://toddjordan.wordpress.com/2008/01/28/twitter-packs-or-are-you-on-the-list/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>chrisbrogan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2008 05:14:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://toddjordan.wordpress.com/?p=31#comment-29</guid>
		<description>But are wikis leaving things off, or are they places where everyone is empowered to add. There wasn&#039;t a they. It was everyone. And when I started, there was only Boston and San Francisco listed. I checked back 40 minutes later, and there was a whole page for geography. 

That&#039;s how wikis work. The thing is, our only typical example is Wikipedia, which has been built out for years. 

You saw, in one day, several hundred acts of self-organization rarely touched by me, and not yet backed out by anyone, as far as I know. When someone broke something, someone else came in and fixed it. 

The lesson wasn&#039;t the packs page. The lesson was the humans and what they did with it. 

Biggest concern: someone puts someone in a box they don&#039;t deserve to be in. I&#039;m gay or I&#039;m a Baptist or I&#039;m from Missouri (show me!). My thought on this: change it to what&#039;s right. 

However, I *do* know that on wikipedia, there are sections that are just uneditable now, because it&#039;s just a forever loop of controversy. Mostly? Religion pages. 

Will it last? *.deity knows. Did I learn from it? Volumes. Only, not the lesson that the naysayers-come-lately think I should&#039;ve learned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But are wikis leaving things off, or are they places where everyone is empowered to add. There wasn&#8217;t a they. It was everyone. And when I started, there was only Boston and San Francisco listed. I checked back 40 minutes later, and there was a whole page for geography. </p>
<p>That&#8217;s how wikis work. The thing is, our only typical example is Wikipedia, which has been built out for years. </p>
<p>You saw, in one day, several hundred acts of self-organization rarely touched by me, and not yet backed out by anyone, as far as I know. When someone broke something, someone else came in and fixed it. </p>
<p>The lesson wasn&#8217;t the packs page. The lesson was the humans and what they did with it. </p>
<p>Biggest concern: someone puts someone in a box they don&#8217;t deserve to be in. I&#8217;m gay or I&#8217;m a Baptist or I&#8217;m from Missouri (show me!). My thought on this: change it to what&#8217;s right. </p>
<p>However, I *do* know that on wikipedia, there are sections that are just uneditable now, because it&#8217;s just a forever loop of controversy. Mostly? Religion pages. </p>
<p>Will it last? *.deity knows. Did I learn from it? Volumes. Only, not the lesson that the naysayers-come-lately think I should&#8217;ve learned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
